But the way the referees are controlling things probably unsettles Australia more. They have a more mobile pack and would like to play fast, flowing football and that is being stifled a little. I like two referees being used in the NRL but I would rather they had one good one at the World Cup than two who rule things differently.
The Kiwis seem to have been able to adapt to momentum well so far at the World Cup. They have produced the best 40 minutes of any team at this competition and I like the way they are trying to play structured, disciplined football. It's about building pressure. They could have easily fallen away from the game plan in the early games because they won easily. But they are trying to build the combinations that will be crucial.
I'm sure Frank Pritchard would have been rapped over the knuckles for his crazy offload against France, though the game was well and truly won.
The fact there is really good competition for places makes the coach's job easier. Players know they have to perform or someone is there to take their spot and, as a selector, it's intriguing.
Kevin Locke is getting a start at fullback tomorrow morning against Scotland but I still see Josh Hoffman as the No1.
Hoffman is excellent at cleaning up at the back and rarely makes a mistake, which is crucial in the wet, and is also a good support player.
Even if Locke has a good game against Scotland, I still can't see him forcing his way into the squad to face England next weekend.
At least we are talking about selection issues and not off-the-field ones like Australia. Coach Tim Sheens has expressed his disappointment following the Billy Slater incident and it takes the focus away from what they are trying to achieve.
I don't know if any of the Kiwis have been out until 3am but they look focused. It probably helps they are moving around so much because there's less time to get bored.
It's just another thing working in our favour. So far so good.