In 1996 and 2003 writer and MP Debra Coddington released two editions of a sex offenders' index, the first with 500 names and the second with 1200 names, based on court records of crimes against both adults and children.
All court-imposed suppressions were respected. It caused an uproar. She received death threats.
We can all agree that the harm done to a child by a sex offender is catastrophic and impacts for years beyond the crime. But it is a logical fallacy that there be some kind of parallel millstone around a sex offender's neck for all time.
The courts determine guilt and the sentence required, and it would seem they may now appear on a register for a time. But most sex offenders do not reoffend.
And I do believe that, in a fair society, all persons who have served their time are entitled to take on the responsibility of living the rest of their lives without offence, in the community, without being constantly reminded of their crime - as a register will be prone to do.
Mob mentality is never far from the surface and it angers me when I see posters going up or flyers being handed out, purporting to warn about a person in the neighbourhood. That is victimisation and vigilantism.
It's scaremongering.
If a register can be contained to the dry administrative work it is designed to support, then that's well and good. But in the wrong hands it will be a disaster.