The other curious response has been an assumption that my interview would be either an unfair hatchet job, or an occasion in which I got "owned" by the interviewee. Or possibly even both. It seems, for some people, there is no other possible outcome for such an interview.
I guess people, on all sides, hear and see what they want to hear and see.
There is also the bile. This email, not untypical of its type, came in after the short clip was published on Tuesday.
"Your interview and newspaper article on Jordan Peterson was truly awful. It was the worst case of smear I have ever read. You are either a evil person or you suffer from early onset dementia. It is time to retire. Posterity will remember you as a demented liar."
I can't help thinking, what would Jordan Peterson do? The author of 12 Rules for Life advises (rule 1) that we "stand up straight with our shoulders back", which is a way of saying behave with dignity. And there's rule 6: "Set your house in perfect order before you criticise the world."
Still, bring it on. We're all talking to each other and that's something, I guess.
The interview clip attached to this story is from the full interview. In it, we talk about violence, but we're also talking about Peterson's rule 10: "Be precise in your speech."
Simon Wilson's full interview with Jordan Peterson will be online on Saturday morning, and his feature article on Peterson's town hall meeting this week will be in the Weekend Herald that same day.