Scientists have found an easy new way to pick one dolphin out from another - which could prove vital in conservation efforts.

"We have photographed individual dolphin's dorsal fins and established a catalogue of dolphins that can be differentiated by differences in their dorsal fin edge markings and pigmentation patterns," Niwa cetacean biologist Dr Krista Hupman said.

Scientists used catalogues of animals to determine how many animals occupy a region and such information can be used to determine if the population was in decline.

Yet some dolphins could be hard to count as they occurred in large populations, over vast areas and may lack distinctive markings for identification.


That meant many scientists shied away from using photo-identification to conduct population estimates, and instead used aerial or shipboard surveys.

Hupman said these methods might not be the best for counting animals - and limited our ability to learn about individual animals.

"It's really hard to know how many dolphins there are of some species, because they travel over large distances and don't have any distinctive markings," she said.

"We've developed a reliable photo-identification method that challenges how dolphins are counted that could have significant impact on the management of these animals."

While there was already a way to use photo-identification to estimate the number of poorly marked dolphins, it involved establishing new methods, such as using dorsal fin pigmentation patterns for individual identification.

Over three years, Hupman and a team of researchers collected more than 240,000 images of dolphins in the Hauraki Gulf at different times of the year.

From this vast number of photographs, almost 31,000 were deemed of sufficient quality to use in the identification process.

They were compared manually using nicks and notches and pigmentation patterns.


That resulted in 2083 unique individuals being identified.

"This study formed the largest catalogue of common dolphins worldwide which is a significant achievement for everyone involved in this project," she said.

"This is also the first study using photo-identification to determine the abundance of a large population of dolphins and demonstrates it is possible for species with little distinctive markings.

"The combination of dorsal fin edge markings and pigmentation patterns provided a robust method for individual identification."

Identifying dolphins solely by the pigmentation on their dorsal fins had been thought to be unreliable because the pigmentation changed over time and they were not visible in all dolphin populations.

But Hupman and her team showed that dorsal fin pigmentation could be found on more than 95 per cent of adult common dolphins in the Hauraki Gulf.

They also examined dolphins with photographic records spanning more than 10 years and found no significant changes in the pigmentation pattern over time.

The use of this additional feature will improve the process of counting dolphins in the future and allow more accurate estimates to be generated to manage populations.

Hupman said ecologists should consider the use of photo-identification for generating population estimates for large populations of poorly marked dolphins and that the methods described in the two papers could be implemented for similar animal populations worldwide.

Despite these advances, the team still had improvements to make.

"We want to create a fully computer-automated system for identification for a number of whales and dolphins from photographs and video captured in the field."

The first step was applying an algorithm to classify individuals based on their pigmentation patterns alone, which has resulted in a much faster and efficient system for cataloguing individuals.

"It used to take up to an hour to compare one dolphin image to the entire catalogue of individuals," she said.

"However, by using these algorithms we can match an image to the catalogue in a matter of seconds."

The next stage involved streamlining how photographs are processed by reducing the amount of time required to crop and rotate images so they can be compared to the catalogue.

Hupman and her colleagues have developed an online tool to assist with this, and it was now being used by cetacean scientists from the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

This work was part of an ongoing collaboration with Massey University researchers, which aimed to optimise the use of individual identification for the estimation of abundance.