"Very broadly speaking, the Tribunal is prepared to accept, on the basis of its review of the Complainant's evidence, that whilst the teacher's actions were unlawful and constituted misconduct, she did not intend permanently to deprive the school of the money which she advanced to herself, but was treating it as a loan which she intended to pay," the decision read.
The Tribunal also noted evidence suggested that what Rogers did was a practice not uncommon in the school at the time.
A censure has been put in place and certain conditions have been placed against Rogers' name; including having to undergo certain professional development courses before taking up any position in a school involving financial responsibility.
She will also have to inform any school about the incident, before taking up a role there.
Rogers applied for name suppression; acknowledging that having her name published would bring shame upon her family. The application, however, was declined.