“I am not satisfied that there is sufficient evidence to support the introduction of proposed vibration controls recommended by the Independent Hearing Panel. In regard to noise sensitivity, I agreed with the council’s alternative, which is less likely to impose unnecessary costs on development,” Bishop said.
“However, I accepted two of the IHP’s recommendations to retain two land areas as Future Urban Zone. In one case this change involved the least change from the operative zoning. This is appropriate given the complexity of the planning issues associated with this site.
“In regard to the other land parcel, I agreed with the IHPs recommendation to retain the Future Urban Zone while the potential effects on the interface between adjacent zones are appropriately considered.”
The minister’s decision is final and cannot be appealed to the Environment Court.
More to come