The flag debate's bubbled beneath the surface in this country for more than 40 years and unlike the Aussies, we see it as separate from becoming a republic.
The most vehement opposition, up until now, has come from the RSA which has always said change is disrespectful to those who have fought and died under the current ensign. Having had a grandfather serve at Gallipoli and family fighting in the Second World War, that argument's a crock of the old proverbial. Growing up, the importance of the flag was never mentioned around the dinner table, in relation to the wars, but the antipathy towards the British was frequently raised.
And yet we still have the Union Jack taking pride of place on our ensign.
READ MORE:
• Campaign star tactics bother RSA
• Call for youth to get a say on flag referendum
• Aussie group backing Kiwi flag change
Having visited every battlefield in Europe, Turkey and North Africa where our troops have fought and died abroad, some of them with old diggers who fought there, not once was the flag mentioned. As they stood over their mates' graves, always lamenting the futility of war, the old soldiers laid wreaths beneath the headstones featuring a stylised fern, not a silver one, but one blending into the sandstone.
So put the politics to one side over the coming weeks, forget the cost of democracy, bury the dislike you may have of John Key and take the opportunity you're unlikely to get again and fill out the ballot paper.
Debate on this article is now closed.