It wrote that since Te Urewera became a legal entity in 2013, the Crown contributed $8.87 million or an average of $1.3m annually towards the maintenance of the area, but this was less than what the Department of Conservation (DoC) used to spend on Te Urewera National Park - around $6m to $8m a year.
Te Urewera’s board had contributed $6.63m of the $15.51m spent over the past seven years on hut maintenance, pest control, signs, tracks, visitor operations, human resources and workforce development, financial systems, asset management, equipment and vehicles.
It claimed DoC had “not been keen to shift responsibility and authority to Tūhoe for Te Urewera” and Tūhoe had been lumbered with a “75-year-old DoC-Crown legacy that was not intended by the 2013 Treaty settlement”.
Te Uru Taumatua also stated DoC had rejected collaboration to establish the systems, capability and infrastructure needed to operationalise the Te Urewera Act, according to the pānui.
DoC has been approached for a response to the claims made by Te Uru Taumatua.