Setting aside the fact that although the caricature of an Apple (or Samsung) fan may have some elements of truth to it, we are still talking about a continuum of interest. Only a small number of consumers actually spend their time in lines waiting for the first iPhone or attacking Android users in comment streams.
But what makes someone identify with a brand so strongly as to show this type of behavior at all? Not surprisingly, this question has been an area of extensive research, which has covered three different aspects of the phenomenon, although what has become clear is that the interaction of different factors makes determining the exact relationship of these drivers complicated to unravel.
Self-identity
The first driver behind why we buy a particular product is self-identity. We buy products that have an aesthetic appeal for example, because it helps build our sense of self. Apple in particular has done a very good job of creating a brand that allows its customers to identify with those who "think different." Even though Apple is now a market leader and buying an iPhone is the equivalent of buying a PC in the days of Apple's think-different advertising campaign, there are still vestiges of this that can be associated with a person's sense of self.
Brand drivers
The second driver behind our relationship with a product has to do with the actual product and company itself. This is influenced by factors such as the perceived value of the product, the level of service that came with the purchase and after and the overall level of trust placed in both the product and the company.
Read more:
• New bite of Apple: Smartwatch, iPhone 6 unveiled
• New iPhones top 4 million in pre-orders
Social identity
Although not completely distinct from the previous two drivers, possibly the most important is the concept of our social identity, which helps us again define ourselves through the groups we belong to. As soon as we have defined which groups we belong to, our so-called "in-groups," it positively influences our attitudes towards members of those groups and conversely, dictates our attitudes to groups of people outside our in-groups, the "out-groups."
A key consequence of being in an in-group is that we ignore failures of the group and see attacks on the group as an attack on the self. In particular, these attacks damage our self-esteem. This is why arguments between Apple and Android users can become so personal, because in effect, they are.
Being part of groups is a critical aspect of being human and is part of what guarantees our survival as a species. It is not surprising then that it plays an important role in everything that we do, including the "brand groups" we may belong to.
So, before accusing someone of being an iSheep, remember that you may be saying it because you are part of your very own "Sheep" in-group.
This article was originally published on The Conversation.
*David Glance is the director of the Centre for Software Practice at University of Western Australia.
-Washington Post