Even at the height of the Soviet Union's power, the notion that Moscow could intervene in a US presidential election to try to influence the outcome was something reserved for Cold War fantasy. Now, the CIA says it just happened.
It might be tempting to look at the list of victories in Putin's ledger over the past 12 months and assume that nothing can stop the Kremlin.
But Russia is not the Soviet Union, this is not the Cold War, and Moscow is not looking for world domination.
Putin's goal is limited to reducing US influence while ensuring Russia's vital interests, and the power he can project is still limited by a weak economy and a global reach that pales in comparison with that of the United States.
He can't act anywhere he wants, he can't do it alone, and a lot still depends on whether and how far Trump decides to go along with him.
For the moment, Trump is coming off as a closer friend to the erstwhile Russian adversary than the political establishment he is about to head up in Washington, as evidenced by the tweet of approval the President-elect sent over the way Putin handled the Obama Administration's sanctions.
"Putin is trying to articulate new rules for the world with a little help from Western troublemakers," said Andrei Kolesnikov, a senior associate at the Carnegie Moscow Centre. "But economically, Russia is still very weak, and politically, it is fragile."
Indeed, Russia is a poorer country than it was three years ago, when Putin took on the West in the conflict in Ukraine. According to figures published in the Moscow Times, Russia's gross domestic product reached a peak of US$2.2 trillion in 2013 and has since declined to US$1.3 trillion, lower than Italy, Brazil, and Canada, while the per capita gross domestic product is below US$9000, according to the International Monetary Fund. The country remains dependent on the export of natural resources; structural reform of the economy and privatisation of state industry has stalled.
The percentage of Russians who had any savings fell from 72 per cent in 2013 to 27 per cent in 2016, according to a year-end analysis published on gazeta.ru. For the first time in seven years, Russians are spending more than half their money on groceries.
"Putin has one Russia; many Russians have another. The two don't really intersect much," observed Alexei Gusarov, who hosts a talk show on Ekho Moskvy radio.
Why does this matter?
Because all of Russia's power moves, at the moment, depend entirely on Putin, because the Russian President has so effectively consolidated power.
"In Russia, only one individual decides what is in Russia's national interest and what is not. There is no institutional or public input to take into account," commented Vladimir Frolov, a Moscow-based political analyst.
Putin's decision-making has kept his popularity rating in the 80s for months on end, according to the Levada Centre. But just 53 per cent of Russians think the country is headed in the right direction. Putin looks poised to win re-election in 2018, should he decide to run, but it remains to be seen whether increased economic pain will erode that certainty.
Meanwhile, Putin's ship of state sails on, and much like that undersize, smoke-belching aircraft carrier that changed the balance of power in Syria, its success depends on other countries letting it be successful.
Putin has succeeded because he picks fights with the US only when Russian vital interests are stake and Russia has a reasonable chance of prevailing, said Simon Saradzhyan, founding director of the Russia Matters Project at Harvard's Belfer Centre for Science and International Affairs.
Saradzhyan argues that the primary consideration here is whether the US is willing to commit its full might: In Ukraine, US vital interests were not at stake, and ultimately, he said, the Obama Administration decided they were not in Syria, either.
"Soviet leaders sought to counter the US everywhere and anywhere," Saradzhyan said. "Putin has a much more limited outlook shaped by capacities of his country's economy, demographics and other components of national might."
Putin said as much at his nationally broadcast annual news conference, when he responded to Trump's call to expand the US nuclear arsenal by saying that Russia's upgrades were intended to overcome any aggressor but not to enter into an arms race "that we cannot afford".
Not long ago, Russian defence officials floated the idea of restoring Soviet-era bases in Cuba and Vietnam to go along with the newly acquired foothold in Syria. That went nowhere fast.
Even as Putin steams into 2017 at the height of his power, the question is what happens to Russia's standing the moment Trump takes control of the world's most powerful nation.
While Moscow is likely to continue to push to expand its influence where it can at the expense of the US, co-opting the new administration - for example, in the fight against terrorism - wherever it is feasible, Putin is unlikely to act in a way that openly challenges the new US president.
"I think Moscow's expectation of Trump is that he would hit back hard enough to hurt Russia and thus it is better not to goad him unnecessarily," Frolov said.
