It's a manufactured scenario that allows a player to break his contract with time to still serve on it. The insistence that it is nothing more than a boy wanting to be near his father to support his family is a smoke screen. Manipulation of this kind is a trend sneaking into rugby league to legitimately move players around.
It has happened in Europe for many years by agents requesting transfers to another club on behalf of players and when the request is denied, the player starts to become disruptive until he turns into a problem; he then gets his way and moves on.
The less troublesome approach is to request a move for personal reasons where you are less likely to anger the fans.
Back to Ricky Stuart; the only way he could do this without 100 per cent scorn was on personal grounds and the well-being of his daughter.
He had grounds to leave because a clause written into his contract allowed him to move if the board interfered with his job. The board did not interfere as such but their public grievances were causing him issues.
But more than this, Ricky created a problem by cutting half of his squad and signed new talent for the future. How can you walk out while speaking of perseverance? Use the family card. Not disregarding the fact that his daughter suffers an illness, but Ricky has long suffered in Sydney without family support. It appears a convenient defence at a difficult time.