Sunday, 10 December 2023
KaitaiaWhangareiDargavilleAucklandThamesTaurangaHamiltonWhakataneRotoruaTokoroaTe KuitiTaumarunuiTaupoGisborneNew PlymouthNapierHastingsDannevirkeWhanganuiPalmerston NorthLevinParaparaumuMastertonWellingtonMotuekaNelsonBlenheimWestportReeftonKaikouraGreymouthHokitikaChristchurchAshburtonTimaruWanakaOamaruQueenstownDunedinGoreInvercargill
NZ HeraldThe Northern AdvocateThe Northland AgeThe AucklanderWaikato HeraldBay Of Plenty TimesRotorua Daily PostHawke's Bay TodayWhanganui ChronicleThe Stratford PressManawatu GuardianKapiti NewsHorowhenua ChronicleTe Awamutu CourierVivaEat WellOneRoofDRIVEN Car GuideThe CountryPhoto SalesiHeart RadioRestaurant Hub
Voyager 2023 media awards
Subscribe
Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.
Home / New Zealand / Politics

Slater must reveal his sources, judge rules

NZ Herald
Saveshare

Share this article

facebookcopy linktwitterlinkedinredditemail
Whale Oil blogger Cameron Slater. Photo / Doug Sherring

Whale Oil blogger Cameron Slater. Photo / Doug Sherring

Whale Oil blogger Cameron Slater was acting as a journalist when writing allegedly defamatory posts about an Auckland businessman but must reveal his sources for the articles, a High Court judge has ruled.

The judge reached the conclusion that Slater was a journalist even though the Whale Oil publisher denied he was one in 2012, the year when the articles in question were released.

Slater is being sued for defamation by discharged bankrupt Matthew Blomfield, who did marketing work for Hells Pizza until 2008 and a was a director of a company that owned several of the pizza chain's stores.

Slater during five weeks in 2012 wrote 13 articles referring to Blomfield, who claims the Whale Oil publisher defamed him.

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

The bulk of these articles contain extracts from emails allegedly associated with Blomfield and refer to files which the businessman says came from his hard-drive and potentially a file cabinet belonging to him.

Slater admitted publishing the articles at issue but denied they conveyed the alleged defamatory meanings and has also raised the defence of truth and honest opinion.

Blomfield in August 2013 applied to the Manukau District Court wanting orders that Slater disclose who supplied the hard drive and other information.

Slater opposed this on the basis he was a journalist and such disclosure would require him to reveal the "informants" whose identities he had promised he would keep secret.

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

Judge Blackie last September said Whale Oil was a blog site and the relevant sections of the Evidence Act - which give journalists certain protections from revealing sources - did not provide a basis for Slater to refuse disclosure.

Slater appealed to the High Court and in a decision released today, Justice Raynor Asher said the definition of a journalist under the Evidence Act could include a blogger.

"The Whale Oil website was a news medium in that it was disseminating new and recent stories of public interest. While its style and focus can be criticised, it was breaking news to a significant section of the New Zealand public," Justice Asher said.

The judge said that Slater was a journalist and could invoke source protection under the Evidence Act.

Related articles

New Zealand|Politics

Why Whaledump came forward

18 Aug 08:56 PM
New Zealand|Politics

Slater: Ede is 'gutless'

19 Aug 03:15 AM
New Zealand|Politics

'Teapot Tapes' cop to assess complaint

18 Aug 10:33 PM
New Zealand|Politics

English: 'I wasn't after revenge'

19 Aug 01:43 AM

However, the judge also granted orders sought by Blomfield that this section of the law not apply to Slater in this case.

There was a "public interest" in the disclosure of the identity of Slater's informants, Justice Asher said.

"There is a real public interest in those who claim that they are defamed being able to fully explore the circumstances of the defamation..." the judge said.

This was not a whistle blower case and it seemed the information was obtained illegally by sources, which diminished the importance of protecting them, the judge said.

"Moreover, any concern at the chilling effect of disclosure of sources is lessened when the subject matter of the material originally disclosed has the mark of a private feud, and features abusive and vindictive language."

Saveshare

Share this article

facebookcopy linktwitterlinkedinredditemail
Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

Latest from New Zealand

New Zealand

Lotto Powerball results: One lucky player wins $8.25m prize

09 Dec 09:04 AM
New Zealand

More delays at Auckland Airport after processing system crash

09 Dec 08:41 AM
New Zealand

'Serious injuries': Four-vehicle crash in Waikato

09 Dec 08:26 AM
New Zealand

'Horrific winds': Crews tackle blazes across several South Island regions

09 Dec 07:41 AM

“Never been a better time to buy an EV”

sponsored
Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

Latest from New Zealand

Lotto Powerball results: One lucky player wins $8.25m prize

Lotto Powerball results: One lucky player wins $8.25m prize

09 Dec 09:04 AM

Tonight’s winner is the 18th Powerball multi-millionaire of 2023

More delays at Auckland Airport after processing system crash

More delays at Auckland Airport after processing system crash

09 Dec 08:41 AM
'Serious injuries': Four-vehicle crash in Waikato

'Serious injuries': Four-vehicle crash in Waikato

09 Dec 08:26 AM
'Horrific winds': Crews tackle blazes across several South Island regions

'Horrific winds': Crews tackle blazes across several South Island regions

09 Dec 07:41 AM
9 big questions over an EV road trip
sponsored

9 big questions over an EV road trip

About NZMEHelp & SupportContact UsSubscribe to NZ HeraldHouse Rules
Manage Your Print SubscriptionNZ Herald E-EditionAdvertise with NZMEBook Your AdPrivacy Policy
Terms of UseCompetition Terms & ConditionsSubscriptions Terms & Conditions
© Copyright 2023 NZME Publishing Limited
TOP