During a torrid parliamentary question time, Key confirmed English had known nearly a month before him that the Government Communications Security Bureau had helped law enforcement agencies ahead of the police raid on Dotcom's mansion.
English did not ring Key or brief him about that on the Prime Minister's return from overseas.
It was perhaps the first time since becoming Labour's leader that David Shearer has had Key floundering in the House. A more severe test of that would have been a snap debate pitting the two leaders against each other. But Speaker Lockwood Smith turned down Shearer's application for one.
That did not stop Shearer claiming the "spy debacle" had exposed chaos and incompetence in the upper echelons of the Beehive, while Winston Peters argued the fiasco was evidence of a "woefully dysfunctional" working relationship between Key and English.
While it might be evidence of woeful neglect on English's part, there are no signs or suggestions the pair's relationship is in trouble.
Sure, they do not agree on everything. Never have. There is an inevitable tension between English, the more right-leaning driver of the Government's reform programme, and Key's innate pragmatism and caution. Still, English has had a pretty free hand to do much of what he wanted to do over the past four years. But Key ultimately holds veto powers by virtue of two thumping election victories and National's continuing bull run in the opinion polls.
English's behaviour is inexplicable. But the Dotcom affair has seen farce increasingly piled on farce. You would accordingly have to favour botch-up on English's part ahead of conspiracy.
Debate on this article is now closed.
