Not all Māori are the same or anywhere close to it. Even at the Fletcher's site they're scrapping with each other. There is no cohesive Māori voice, never has been, never will be.
The Greens suffer the same issue. Under the broadest of environmental umbrellas they represent a cause, but it's never taken off. It's never been harnessed as successfully as it could have been, simply because one green is not the same as another.
Once again we find the scrap at Ihumātao as an example. At the communist agitator end of the Greens, Marama Davidson, Golriz Ghahraman, Chloe Swarbrick, they can't get enough of a good old cause. You'll note James Shaw, the sensible one, isn't within a hundred miles of it. He must be pulling his hair out when he sees stuff like that.
The person who wants to save a snail, open a walking track, or run their compost bin on solar panels doesn't get Swarbrick or Davidson, and I suspect secretly wishes they'd go away and let the Greens be green instead of activists and stirrers.
And that's before you get to yet another irony of the Greens' presence, they're protesting against themselves. They seem to forget they're essentially part of the government.
The protesters want the government to do something, so the greenies are saying to themselves, given they are part of the solution, that they want themselves to do something. That's how nuts it all is.
Political progress and success is based on concepts, ideas, and moving a country forward.
The Māori Party was based on the past and anger. And an attempt to resurrect it now, will be based on exactly the same thing, and even if it flickered to any sort of life, will end up in exactly the same fashion.