Thursday, 18 August 2022
Meet the JournalistsPremiumAucklandWellingtonCanterbury/South Island
CrimePoliticsHealthEducationEnvironment and ClimateNZ Herald FocusData journalismKāhu, Māori ContentPropertyWeather
Small BusinessOpinionPersonal FinanceEconomyBusiness TravelCapital Markets
Politics
Premium SportRugbyCommonwealth GamesCricketRacingNetballBoxingLeagueFootballSuper RugbyAthleticsBasketballMotorsportTennisCyclingGolfAmerican SportsHockeyUFC
NZH Local FocusThe Northern AdvocateThe Northland AgeThe AucklanderWaikato HeraldBay of Plenty TimesHawke's Bay TodayRotorua Daily PostWhanganui ChronicleStratford PressManawatu GuardianKapiti NewsHorowhenua ChronicleTe Awamutu Courier
Covid-19
Te Rito
Te Rito
OneRoof PropertyCommercial Property
Open JusticeVideoPodcastsTechnologyWorldOpinion
SpyTVMoviesBooksMusicCultureSideswipeCompetitions
Fashion & BeautyFood & DrinkRoyalsRelationshipsWellbeingPets & AnimalsVivaCanvasEat WellCompetitionsRestaurants & Menus
New Zealand TravelAustralia TravelInternational Travel
Our Green FutureRuralOneRoof Property
Career AdviceCorporate News
Driven MotoringPhotos
SudokuCodecrackerCrosswordsWordsearchDaily quizzes
Classifieds
KaitaiaWhangareiDargavilleAucklandThamesTaurangaHamiltonWhakataneRotoruaTokoroaTe KuitiTaumarunuiTaupoGisborneNew PlymouthNapierHastingsDannevirkeWhanganuiPalmerston NorthLevinParaparaumuMastertonWellingtonMotuekaNelsonBlenheimWestportReeftonKaikouraGreymouthHokitikaChristchurchAshburtonTimaruWanakaOamaruQueenstownDunedinGoreInvercargill
NZ HeraldThe Northern AdvocateThe Northland AgeThe AucklanderWaikato HeraldBay Of Plenty TimesRotorua Daily PostHawke's Bay TodayWhanganui ChronicleThe Stratford PressManawatu GuardianKapiti NewsHorowhenua ChronicleTe Awamutu CourierVivaEat WellOneRoofDriven MotoringThe CountryPhoto SalesNZ Herald InsightsWatchMeGrabOneiHeart RadioRestaurant Hub

Advertisement

Advertise with NZME.
New Zealand|Politics

Legal challenge to Government gun law thrown out

2 Jul, 2019 06:45 AM4 minutes to read
The High Court has tossed out a case from the Kiwi Party that the Government's gun law reforms were unconstitutional and breached the Treaty of Waitangi. Photo / Mark Mitchell

The High Court has tossed out a case from the Kiwi Party that the Government's gun law reforms were unconstitutional and breached the Treaty of Waitangi. Photo / Mark Mitchell

Derek Cheng
By
Derek Cheng

Senior Writer

VIEW PROFILE

The High Court has dismissed a challenge to the Government's new gun law that argued that the right to bear arms should be protected as taonga under the Treaty of Waitangi.

The Kiwi Party had challenged the validity of the Arms Amendment Act and the expedited process by which it was passed, and asked the court to forbid the Government from acting on the law until six months after the 2020 election or until a referendum could be held.

But Justice Edwin Wylie said the party's case was untenable on all grounds except its claim that an Order in Council to prevent stockpiling went beyond the Government's legal authority.

But because the Order had already been superseded by the law, Wylie added that this point was not a reason to stop the law from being in force.

The party, which was created by licenced firearms owners and is different to the party of the same name that broke away from United Future in 2007, is now taking its case to the Court of Appeal.

The new gun law passed in April after a truncated select committee process. It outlawed most military-style semi-automatic weapons and associated parts.

The Kiwi Party argued that the Treaty protected Māori rights to taonga (treasure), and that included "firearms of a nature" for self-defence and resistance.

But Wylie said it was "alarming" to claim that taonga included anything that could deliver a lethal force such as military-style semi-automatic firearms, and dismissed this as "entirely speculative and without foundation".

Advertisement

Advertise with NZME.

He added that this line of argument was not even relevant because the Treaty of Waitangi did not confer enforceable legal rights.

The party also argued that the law violated private property rights and the Bill of Rights 1688, which has a clause about the right to defend yourself with arms.

Related articles

New Zealand|Politics

Haste on gun law reform questionable, but no one's going to lose any votes

03 Apr 01:00 AM
New Zealand|Politics

Police to gun community: Amnesty doesn't apply to gun use

11 Apr 12:41 AM
New Zealand|Politics

Money for gun buy-back scheme may not be enough

30 May 02:17 AM
New Zealand|Politics

Gun buyback scheme: Who's covered and who misses out

19 Jun 10:30 PM

But Wylie said the clause was about Protestants and included the words "as allowed by law", that the gun law did not ban all firearms, and that the right to private property was never absolute; the Government can take property under, for example, the Public Works Act.

Other aspects of the claim were dismissed because a court could not judge the validity of a law, Wylie said.

"Parliament is supreme, and the courts do not have a power to consider the validity of properly enacted laws."

Gun Control NZ co-founder Philippa Yasbek said the decision "put to rest" a number of arguments put forward by the gun lobby, including the right to bear arms in New Zealand.

She said it was "offensive" to suggest that the Treaty included a right to have military-style semi-automatic firearms.

"I'm not sure the Kiwi Party has a particular interest to Māori rights under the Treaty generally. They're merely trying to throw everything in the hope that something will stick."

Advertisement

Advertise with NZME.

Kiwi Party counsel Graeme Minchin disagreed, saying that the Treaty conferred the same rights for Māori as for British citizens, and if Treaty included the right to bear arms for Māori, that right should apply to all New Zealanders.

He said the party had paid $6500 in court costs to the Crown for the High Court case, and would fight its case all the way to the Supreme Court if it had enough money to do so.

The party's main arguments were that the process had lacked appropriate public consultation, that there was a constitutional right to bear arms, and that the gun law was invalid because MMP was not representative of the people, but the "will of the party".

"Parliamentary sovereignty is not absolute. It has to essentially mirror the will of the people."

Advertisement

Advertise with NZME.

Latest from New Zealand

Premium
New Zealand|EducationUpdated

My son couldn't read - now I know why: Inside NZ's falling literacy crisis

17 Aug 04:50 PM
Kahu

Politician's will pay homage to King Tuheitia on Saturday at Turangawaewae Marae

17 Aug 04:45 PM
New ZealandUpdated

Massive fire at scrap metal yard in Christchurch

17 Aug 08:40 AM
New ZealandUpdated

7-year-old Wairoa boy died in Oranga Tamariki care

17 Aug 08:20 AM
New Zealand

'One-in-100-year event': Hundreds evacuated in Nelson after river breaches banks

17 Aug 07:49 AM

Most Popular

Premium
My son couldn't read - now I know why: Inside NZ's falling literacy crisis
New Zealand|EducationUpdated

My son couldn't read - now I know why: Inside NZ's falling literacy crisis

17 Aug 04:50 PM
Nelson to New York: Emotional reunion of long-lost father and son
EntertainmentUpdated

Nelson to New York: Emotional reunion of long-lost father and son

17 Aug 09:30 AM
Massive fire at scrap metal yard in Christchurch
New ZealandUpdated

Massive fire at scrap metal yard in Christchurch

17 Aug 08:40 AM

Advertisement

Advertise with NZME.
About NZMEHelp & SupportContact UsSubscribe to NZ HeraldHouse Rules
Manage Your Print SubscriptionNZ Herald E-EditionAdvertise with NZMEBook Your AdPrivacy Policy
Terms of UseCompetition Terms & ConditionsSubscriptions Terms & Conditions
© Copyright 2022 NZME Publishing Limited
TOP