It was a big year for textiles all round, really. Margaret Stove received a QSM for services to lace-making and Jacqueline McVinnie received the same award for services to ecclesiastical embroidery. Come on, who doesn't want to know more about that?
I do think that to be a worthy recipient you have to do more than be good at your job. That said, those working in difficult fields, such as prisoner rehabilitation and mental health, deserve every recognition. But do people who are well rewarded for a challenging and stimulating career really deserve a gong? Those who use their success and parlay their high profile to support worthwhile causes - Sir Edmund Hilary being the obvious example - are truly deserving, as are those who give their time and energy outside paid employment. Perhaps if an achievement is truly outstanding, Eleanor Catton's winning of the Booker Prize, perhaps, or if a New Zealander won a Nobel Prize, then an honour is appropriate. But simply getting an honour for doing a job you're paid to do seems an easy route to a gong.
However, it's not all hard work and selfless contribution to the community that sees you receive the recognition of your peers. I was at the New Year's Day races with friends who had a horse running in the Railway. We were enjoying lunch when a woman came up and tapped me on the shoulder. "I don't want to interrupt," she said, "but I just wanted to say congratulations. What an honour. And soooo well deserved." I debated whether or not to thank her warmly and look suitably humble, but decided honesty was the best policy. "I'm not Trelise Cooper," I said, "but I'm sure she's absolutely thrilled."
Congratulations to all the recipients of honours - and thank you to all those volunteers and community workers who have yet to be publicly recognised.