"It will certainly be persuasive if there is another High Court case," Mr Laing said. "[The case] raised and clarified a number of issues, including the council's power to fluoridate water ... it's quite an important case in terms of what councils can do, whether they've got the power to do it, and what the implications to the Bill of Rights are too.
"It's a very clear decision and will be interesting to see how it's received," Mr Laing said.
Dr Jonathan Broadbent, public health dentistry specialist at the University of Otago, welcomed the High Court decision.
"This decision reaffirms the legal basis of the scientifically sound practice of community water fluoridation. The people of New Zealand have the right to benefit from this effective public health practice. Community water fluoridation benefits everyone, especially those New Zealanders who are disadvantaged."
Fluoridation has been hotly debated in recent years.
Hamilton City Council decided to stop adding fluoride to the civic water supply on June 21 last year.
Nearly 70 per cent of Hamilton voters later backed fluoride in a referendum. District health board chief executive Craig Climo said there were now no excuses, and Hamilton City Council should put fluoride back in the water.
"Community water fluoridation is one of the very few health interventions where the beneficiary of the service actually doesn't need to do anything to enjoy the benefits," he said.
"It comes at a very low cost and is of very clear health benefit. We shouldn't lose those sorts of opportunities."APNZ