Exemptions to that remain in serious cases such as murder, manslaughter, sexual assaults and aggravated robbery.
There is some criticism, largely stemming from a fear that resources will be tied up with 18-year-olds when it should be focused on 10-13-year-olds where the chance of successful intervention is much higher.
There are others, citing international examples, who say the age should be higher still.
And there will be those who bemoan a "soft on crime" approach.
The debate, of course, is not about which court these young people appear in — it is about how they are punished.
The Youth Court has a range of initiatives and interventions aimed at keeping teenagers out of prison. Put simply, rehabilitation. This is one of the cornerstones of criminal punishment. A poor start in life can lead to a range of problems.
As Youth Court Judge John Walker tells us in today's feature, these probelms "do not stop when a young person reaches 17".
It may be hard to swallow this when it's your home burgled or grandparent mugged, but we owe it to these young people to give them the opportunities that their childhood did not.