In court today Judge James Weir said there was a divergence between the police summary of facts and what was contained in other police disclosure documents, including the notebook of the police officer who attended the scene.
"How can I sentence him today based on that summary of facts? I can't can I because it's clearly incorrect,'' Judge Weir said.
He said the victim's two victim impact statements also differed from what was recorded in the notebooks, including the victim at the time being recorded as saying he didn't want to talk about it or make a complaint and that he had "got what he deserved''. The video footage also appeared to differ from the summary of facts, the judge said.
Ms Dorset said a statement from a witness at the scene had described the victim as being "mouthy and lippy'' and "annoying all day''. She submitted there was some dispute as to the extent of injuries suffered by the victim.
Ms Dorset told the court Robinson had pleaded guilty at the earliest opportunity, which was before the police summary of facts was completed.
She said she had not received some of the other documents until today and agreed with the judge they were inconsistent with the summary. Robinson was keen for the matter to be dealt with as soon as possible, she said.
Judge Weir ordered the police and Ms Dorset to sort out the discrepancies and agree on a summary of facts by tomorrow when Robinson will re-appear in the Rotorua District Court for sentencing.