To qualify, they must also be similar in scale, intensity and character to previous activities. The farmer, not the council, must prove they have existing use rights. However, establishing these rights can be very difficult, as many activities on farm are not documented.
A recent court action shows how complex these issues are.
A farmer planted maize on land that had been rezoned from 'rural' to 'residential'.
Farming was no longer allowed in that zone under the district plan, so the farmer relied on existing use rights. This meant proving that maize had been grown on the property, in the same or similar way, since before 1991.
There were arguments about whether the activity had changed in intensity, scale or character, whether crops had been grown recently and how the effects of cropping were different to those of livestock farming. In the end, existing use rights could be neither proven nor disproven.
The message is that it pays to keep up with changes in regulation, through your rural professional, Federated Farmers or other industry group. And if you are in any doubt about whether something is allowed, ring the council and ask.