"I am traumatised and I think definitely have a fear of going back to any court after being summonsed in a case so similar to my own."
The experience had left her determined that changes needed to be made, she said. "I don't like talking about it but it's something that makes me really angry and I'm thinking about it happening to other people and it doesn't sit right with me."
The woman said the history of potential jurors should be checked before they are called and they should have the opportunity to be excused as soon as they are aware of the nature of the case.
She was also uncomfortable about the list of jurors names being read out in front of the accused. "It (the jury selection) could all be done behind closed doors."
However, a Ministry of Justice spokesperson said the correct process had been followed.
Potential jury members do hear the charges made against the accused before the final jurors are selected, he said.
"It's a valuable public service and we acknowledge it can be distressing but we try and make it as easy as possible ... we can put people in touch with qualified professional counsellors for free," the spokesman said.
It was impossible to vet every one of the 300,000 people called up for jury duty each year, he said and having the charges read out before potential jurors was an important part of the justice system. "I think it's important for justice to be done that the whole process is transparent - and that includes jury selection."