Christchurch relief teacher issued stern warning over racist posts, given final warning

The Teachers Disciplinary Tribunal disagreed with the relief teacher's "in-appropriate behaviour", but did not deem it as being serious misconduct. Photo / Getty Images

A Christchurch relief teacher who sent a friend racist posts on social media to "stimulate discussion" just a few months after the mosque attacks has narrowly escaped being found guilty of serious misconduct.

The Teachers Disciplinary Tribunal has instead issued Simon Humphrey a stern warning about his "ill-considered and unacceptable" racist posts saying any repeat behaviour would almost certainly find him in breach and put his teaching registration at grave risk.

Read More

• Principal cries at teacher disciplinary hearing - NZ Herald
• Teacher misconduct cases treble as teacher shortage forces schools to 'cut corners' - NZ Herald
• Teacher censured for using force on student who threatened to kill him - NZ Herald
• Teaching Council says trebling of misconduct cases not due to teacher shortage - NZ Herald
• NZ high school teacher who drank with student penalised for 'serious lapse of judgement' - NZ H...
• Convicted teacher referred to disciplinary tribunal - NZ Herald
• Teacher stripped of registration over relationship with student - NZ Herald

Humphrey found himself before the tribunal last year after the principal of a Christchurch primary school he was regularly relieving for was forwarded anti-Muslim posts he sent to a friend in May 2019.

The school's principal did not have any issues about Humphrey's behaviour towards children or staff, but requested he be formally censured due to the racist nature of the posts. Among the students Humphrey had taught at the school, one was Muslim.

But Humphrey argued that while he did have concerns around Islamic political extremism and certain immigration rules, any assumption that everything posted reflected his "own staunchly held views is entirely misguided".

"I post on Facebook, not to declare truths I insist everyone should agree with, but to stimulate discussion as a way to challenge and develop my own thinking about difficult and complex issues."

The posts appeared to have only gone to one person.

He also claimed that disagreeing with some aspects of Islam, had "absolutely no bearing" on how he treated individual Muslims and that he had the "mental stability and probity" to separate his political views from his teaching practice which in no way affected the way he dealt with children.

In its decision, the tribunal labelled two of his three posts "ill-considered and undoubtedly inappropriate", as well as a "misguided attempt at creating discussion".

The tribunal disagreed with Humphrey's view that he was trying to stimulate discussion on a difficult issue and felt the "banal" and "provocative" posts were instead aimed at trying to get a rise out of his friend.

It said determining whether Humphrey's behaviour involved serious misconduct had been a "difficult decision" because sending material with racial overtones especially so soon after 51 people were killed in a terror attack in the city affected his fitness to be a teacher and was a definite breach of the code of conduct.

However, because Humphrey had only sent the posts to one friend and had not posted the objectionable material more widely, the tribunal did not find his actions had bought the teaching profession into disrepute and therefore did not meet its high threshold of being deemed serious misconduct.

Humphrey was warned a repeat of this unacceptable behaviour - even it was aimed at just one person - would almost certainly result in a finding of serious misconduct and him most likely being struck off.

The police also assessed the posts under hate speech laws and decided against taking further action.

The school has been granted name suppression.