English said the Government's plan was based on what was feasible.
"While our political opponents talk about a Kiwibuild policy, they actually in practice have a no-build policy.
"That is, where developments are proposed in their community, they are opposing them."
He questioned how Labour would achieve its goal of 100,000 houses when it was opposing large developments in the old Three Kings quarry site and in Pt England.
A bill allowing development in Pt England will come before Parliament this week.
Labour originally said it would back the legislation, but later reversed its position, saying it was "land grab" from local iwi.
Labour's housing spokesman Phil Twyford responded to English's criticism this morning.
"There are so many things that the Government should be doing to fix the housing crisis. They should be banning foreign buyers, they should be building affordable houses, they should be not selling state houses.
"There's a long, long list. But building houses on city parks is not one of those things. It's a nuts idea."
He said the Pt England reserve would grow by 20,000 people in the next 10 years as a result of the nearby Tamaki regeneration project.
"If we build houses on park land, where will the kids play?"
Labour's alternative plan would give the local iwi Ngati Paoa 11ha to develop for commercial housing, while protecting the remainder of the reserve for future generations.