Yet the Auckland plan proposed that two-thirds of all new housing development would be low-rise in the form of attached dwellings and low-rise apartments of four storeys or less.
So Udale posed the question of where all the extra land would come from and calculated that an area about half to two-thirds the current area of the Auckland isthmus could be needed.
"Unlike many other cities in Australasia, there are few areas within the Auckland urban area that present the opportunity for brownfield redevelopment over extensive areas. Auckland has about 385,000 detached homes of which about 120,000 have been constructed within the last 20 years. This paper contends that given the economic value inherent in such housing the great majority of this stock will not be redeveloped within the next 20 to 30 years."
Udale encouraged the council to consider other options in planning for future growth.
"This paper contends that a focus on achieving quality outcomes over the next 10 to 20 years will have a greater impact on achieving the level of economic performance and liveability sought by the mayor's vision than an undue focus on compactness."
Stuart Munro, Milestone Homes' co-owner, said high-rise housing was not the answer because it could not replicate the quality of life and sense of community that traditional homes offered.
"They're not the solution to Auckland's housing shortage. The majority of people don't want to bring up their families in high-rises. Our urban centres are growing and in order to accommodate this growth more land will need to be zoned for construction. Until that happens, we'll keep working to create smart and affordable homes that provide the lifestyle New Zealand families want on the land that is available."