It took the oil company to the High Court at Auckland, where it was decided that if Mobil was liable, it would pay the council-controlled organisation $10 million in damages.
But Justice Sarah Katz in February last year decided that Mobil was not contractually obliged to decontaminate the subsurface of the land.
Waterfront Auckland then challenged the decision and today the Court of Appeal reversed it, awarding a $10 million judgment to the council-controlled organisation.
"We declare that Mobil NZ breached the repair obligation in the 1985 tenancies by failing on termination to remediate hydrocarbon contamination of the land caused by Mobil NZ and its predecessor companies in the Mobil Group since their occupancy began in 1925. The parties having agreed that the cost of such remediation is $10 million, judgment may be entered for that sum," said Justices Ellen France and Forrest Miller.
While Justice Rhys Harrison agreed with his two colleagues to allow the appeal, he had a slightly different take on some of their reasoning. He said he would have remitted the matter back to the High Court for further evidence to determine questions of causation and quantum.
Read the full Court of Appeal decision here: