The case has proved embarrassing for the Zurich-based bank, which nonetheless has maintained throughout the three-year-old case that it knew nothing of Lescaudron's deception and it was as much the victim as Korbatova and his other clients.
Vincent Jeanneret, a lawyer for Credit Suisse, didn't immediately address Korbatova's money claims and a spokeswoman for the bank declined to comment.
The appeals this week were intended to resolve the thorny issue of who owes money and whom they owe it to, while lawyers for Lescaudron's clients failed in an attempt to have the whole investigation reopened.
Korbatova said a discussion of compensation is premature and that her legal team is continuing to investigate the nature of some of Lescaudron's investments in the U.S.
"Why are we talking about reimbursement when we haven't finished looking at where the money disappeared?"
Jeanneret, later in his prepared remarks, rebutted the notion proceedings were rushed. Given the complexity of the case, Geneva prosecutors were wise to focus on the most severe aspects of Lescaudron's deception which led to a rapid prosecution of the Frenchman, said the lawyer. But the trial was thorough with the presiding judge producing a 200-page verdict in Lescaudron's conviction, said Jeanneret.
"It's not every day you see that," he said.
- Bloomberg