In earlier comments, the government's own top medical scientist, NIH Director Dr Francis Collins, said he supported use of aborted foetuses in research. Photo / AP
The Trump administration said it is ending medical research by government scientists that uses human foetal tissue, overriding the advice of scientists who say it has led to life-saving medical advances and handing abortion opponents a major victory.
The Health and Human Services Department said in a statement that government-funded research by universities that involves foetal tissue can continue for now, subject to additional scrutiny — although it also ended one major university project that used the tissue to test HIV treatments.
The policy changes will not affect privately funded research, officials said.
Ending the use of foetal tissue by the National Institutes of Health has been a priority for anti-abortion activists, a core element of President Donald Trump's political base. A senior administration official said it was the president's call. The official wasn't authorised to publicly discuss internal deliberations and spoke on condition of anonymity.
But research using foetal tissue has led to life-saving advances, including development of vaccines for rubella and rabies and drugs to treat the HIV virus. Scientists around the country denounced the decision, saying that foetal tissue was critically needed for research on HIV vaccines, treatments that harness the body's immune system to battle cancer, and a list of other health threats, including some to foetuses themselves.
"Prohibiting valuable research that uses foetal tissue that is otherwise going to be discarded doesn't make any sense," said Dr Lawrence Goldstein, a regenerative medicine specialist at the University of California, San Diego.
"It blocks important future research vital to the development of new therapies."
The government's own top medical scientist, NIH Director Francis Collins, said as recently as last December that he believes "there's strong evidence that scientific benefits come from foetal tissue research ," and that foetal tissue, rather than any alternatives, would "continue to be the mainstay" for certain types of research for the foreseeable future.
"Today, foetal tissue is still making an impact, with clinical trials underway using cells from fetal tissue to treat conditions including Parkinson's disease, ALS, and spinal cord injury," said Doug Melton, co-director of Harvard's Stem Cell Institute and president of the International Society for Stem Cell Research.
Last year, the administration announced a review of whether taxpayer dollars were being properly spent on foetal tissue research. As a result, NIH froze procurement of new tissue.
On Wednesday, the administration also said it is not renewing an expiring contract with the University of California, San Francisco that used foetal tissue to create a human-like immune system in mice for HIV research.
The department said it was trying to balance "pro-life" and "pro-science" imperatives.
Kristan Hawkins, president of Students for Life of America, said in a statement that the administration has "once again done the right thing in restoring a culture of life to our government."
The Susan B. Anthony List, a group that works to elect lawmakers opposed to abortion, said in a statement that taxpayer funding ought to go to promoting alternatives to using foetal tissue in medical research. The NIH is funding a US$20 million programme to "develop, demonstrate, and validate experimental models that do not rely on human foetal tissue from elective abortions."
That idea got strong support from a Republican senator who oversees NIH funding.
"Today's action is a significant pro-life victory," Sen. Roy Blunt of Missouri said in a statement. NIH "has directed funding toward the development of alternative research methods that do not rely on human foetal tissue from elective abortions and I remain supportive of that effort."
But the scientific consensus is there is no adequate substitute for foetal tissues in some research areas. For example, to learn how the mosquito-borne Zika virus moves from a pregnant woman's bloodstream into her foetus and attacks the developing brain — and how to prevent that — requires studying foetal brain cells, neuroscientist Sally Temple of the Neural Stem Cell Institute in New York wrote in the journal Science this year.
"Despite the president's pledge to 'end the HIV epidemic,' today's announcement poses a direct threat to crucial research to find treatments for HIV and other health threats," Megan Donovan of the Guttmacher Institute, a research organization that supports abortion rights. "Ideologues should not be allowed to stand in for real doctors and scientists when the government is making decisions about life-saving medicine."
The government has funded research using foetal tissue for decades, under administrations of both political parties.
Officials said there are currently at least three active federal research projects that involve human foetal tissue, and possibly as many as 12. Among university research projects funded by the government, officials said fewer than 200 of 50,000 rely on human foetal tissue.
The International Society for Stem Cell Research questioned whether the new scrutiny that university projects will face will follow long-accepted ethical guidelines or instead block the research for ideological reasons. "These new restrictions have no scientific or ethical basis," Melton said.
Aside from the cancelled UCSF contract, no university-led programmes will be affected for the time being, the administration said. New projects that propose to use foetal tissue and current projects up for renewal will be subject to additional reviews.
- AP