A burnt car is seen in front of a damaged City Hall building, in Kharkiv, Ukraine. Photo / AP
Moscow posted a death toll from its attack on Ukraine for the first time, and Russians who long avoided politics are now grappling with the fact that their country is fighting a deadly conflict.
On February 23, Razil Malikov, a tank driver in the Russian army, called his family and said he would be home soon; his unit's military drills in Crimea were just about wrapping up.
The next morning, Russia invaded Ukraine, and Malikov hasn't been heard from since. On Monday, Ukraine published a video of a captured soldier in his unit, apologising for taking part in the invasion.
"He had no idea they could send him to Ukraine," Malikov's brother, Rashid Allaberganov, said in a phone interview from the western Russian region of Bashkortostan. "Everyone is in a state of shock."
The reality of war is dawning across Russia.
On Wednesday, the Russian Defence Ministry for the first time announced a death toll for Russian service members in the conflict. While casualty figures in wartime are notoriously unreliable — and Ukraine has put the total of Russian dead in the thousands — the 498 Moscow acknowledged in the seven days of fighting is the largest in any of its military operations since the war in Chechnya, which marked the beginning of President Vladimir Putin's tenure in 1999.
Russians who long avoided engaging with politics are now realising that their country is fighting a deadly conflict, even as the Kremlin gets ever more aggressive in trying to shape the narrative. Its slow-motion crackdown on freedoms has become a whirlwind of repression of late, as the last vestiges of a free press faced extinction.
This week, lawmakers proposed a 15-year prison sentence for people who post "fakes" about the war, and rumours are swirling about soon-to-be-closed borders or martial law. The Education Ministry scheduled a video lesson to be shown in schools nationwide Thursday that described the war against Ukraine as a "liberation mission."
And in Moscow, the regional office of the Committee of Soldiers' Mothers of Russia has been fielding 2,000 calls a day since last Thursday.
"The parents' first question is: What happened to my child?" said Alexander Latynin, a senior committee official. "Is he alive?"
Seizing on the worries of Russian families, Ukraine has pushed to publicise the fact that many young Russian soldiers were dying or being taken prisoner — a reality that the Russian military did not acknowledge until Sunday, the fourth day of the war. Ukrainian government agencies and volunteers have published videos of disoriented Russian prisoners of war saying they had no idea they were about to be part of an invasion until just before it began, and photographs and footage showed the bodies of Russian soldiers strewn on streets and fields.
The videos are reaching some Russians directly. Yevgeniya A. Ivanova, for instance, identified a friend of hers, Viktor A. Golubev, who appeared in one of the videos. In it, Golubev said he "feels guilty for his wrong actions" on Ukrainian soil and calls on Putin "to find a compromise to avoid war."
To some Russians, the toll in human lives is reason enough to oppose the war, and OVD-Info, an activist group that tallies arrests, has counted at least 7,359 Russians detained during seven days of protests in scores of cities across the country.
"It's the third decade of the 21st century, and we are watching news about people burning in tanks and bombed-out buildings," Alexei Navalny, an opposition leader, wrote in a social media post from prison Wednesday, calling on Russians to continue to rally despite the withering police crackdown. "Let's not 'be against war.' Let's fight against war."
Members of the Russian elite also continued to speak out. Lyudmila Narusova, a member of Russia's upper house of Parliament, told the independent Dozhd television channel Sunday that dead Russian soldiers in Ukraine lay "unburied; wild, stray dogs gnawing on bodies that in some cases cannot be identified because they are burned."
"I do not identify myself with those representatives of the state that speak out in favour of the war," Narusova said. "I think they themselves do not know what they are doing. They are following orders without thinking."
The Russian International Affairs Council, a government-funded think tank, published an article by a prominent expert describing the war as a strategic debacle. The expert, Ivan Timofeev, said Ukrainian society would now "see Russia as an enemy for several decades to come." He added a veiled warning directed at government officials who were now cracking down on people speaking out against the war.
"History shows that those who look for 'traitors' sooner or later themselves become victims of 'enthusiasts' and 'well-wishers,'" wrote Timofeev, the council's program director.
But the discontent showed no sign of affecting Putin's campaign, as Russia's assault on Ukraine widened, with heavy fighting reported for the port city of Mariupol on the Sea of Azov. The government signalled it would only intensify its crackdown against the war's critics — including those who called it a "war" rather than, in the Kremlin's anodyne term, a "special military operation."
"Individuals who carry out falsification must be punished in the most severe way," said Vasily Piskaryov, a senior lawmaker in Putin's party. "They are discrediting the absolutely rightful and understandable actions of our armed forces."
His proposed punishment: 15 years in prison. The Parliament, which is controlled by the Kremlin, will take up the law Friday.
Some feared that Putin could go even further, repressing dissent to an extent unseen in Russia since Soviet times. Tatiana Stanovaya, a scholar who has long studied Putin, wrote it was "more than logical" to expect that lawmakers this week would approve the imposition of martial law in order to block the open internet, ban all protests and restrict Russians from being able to leave the country.
Such speculation, fed by how quickly the Kremlin was moving to block access to individual news media outlets and arrest protesters, has led increasing numbers of Russians to flee the country.
Echo of Moscow, Russia's flagship liberal-leaning radio station, was taken off the air Tuesday for the first time since the Soviet coup attempt of 1991. Leading staff members of Dozhd, Russia's only remaining independent television channel, left the country Wednesday after access to its website was blocked.
"It's clear that the personal security of some of us is under threat," wrote Tikhon Dzyadko, the channel's editor-in-chief, explaining why he had decided to "temporarily" depart.
There was also evidence that, even though the war took many Russians by surprise, significant numbers had come to accept it as unavoidable or forced upon Russia by an aggressive NATO. The economic crisis touched off by the West's harsh sanctions reinforced that narrative for some. On Wednesday, the ruble plumbed new lows as more companies like Siemens and Oracle announced they would reduce their operations in Russia and as the central bank ordered the Moscow stock exchange to remain shut Thursday for the fourth straight day.
At a Moscow shopping mall Wednesday, a young couple lining up for cash at an ATM said they opposed the war. And yet they said that the way the world was punishing them for it was not fair, either, considering that the United States had fought its own wars in recent decades without coming under harsh international sanctions.
"Just as you can criticise the government, you can criticise Western countries," said Maksim Filatov, 25, who manages a hookah bar business. "When there were analogous situations in other countries involving the United States, there were no such attacks, and they didn't drive the country into crisis."
And the Committee of Soldiers' Mothers, despite being a firsthand witness to the tragedy wrought by the war, had decided to support it, according to Latynin, the senior official. He echoed the words of Putin, who last week described his "special military operation" as one of "self-defence."
"We understand that no armed conflict comes without victims," Latynin said. "But this was a necessary step, because it was impossible to go on like this."
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Written by: Ivan Nechepurenko and Anton Troianovski
Photographs by: Sergey Ponomarev
© 2022 THE NEW YORK TIMES
Starship, at 123m tall, is key to the billionaire's Mars colonisation plans.