A statement signed by Sanzaar boss Andy Marinos defends the system and this year's scenarios as a one-off.
On that logic, Super Rugby will be unchanged for the next four years.
That's something to look forward to isn't it?
An extended tournament where teams avoid any New Zealand matches, where every squad has a month's break before being asked to kick-start their programmes and head for the finals.
Then we've got the situation for this final round where the Lions have weighed up the odds and decided to gamble with a second XV travelling to Argentina while their top mob prepares for the finals at home.
I don't blame the top Lions side for avoiding the massive return travel trip to Argentina the week before they host their quarter-final. The tactic may not end in success but the Lions will have a rejuvenated group of players to give them a better chance of making inroads in the finals.
They look like they will face a New Zealand side in the quarters and if the Lions have a fresh squad, home advantage and their loyal fans to host a team which has any edge knocked off them by travel, their rationale makes sense.
It's the format which is skew-whiff because organisers have pandered to audiences in South Africa, Australia and New Zealand. So why didn't tournament partners Argentina or Japan get to host a quarter-final?
We can't do round-robin events as there is not enough room on the calendar, organisers say. We need to move into new markets.
Well hello, the Super 12 was a ripper event, all over by June and it looked after the demands on players, meant each game was important and gave teams time to recuperate for later in the year.