USA Today have forecasted 17 medals, including five golds, Sports Illustrated expect us to win 16 medals (five golds), Associated Press believe New Zealand are in line for 14 medals and the Wall Street Journal have penned in 13 medals (five golds).
Contrast that with more pessimistic prophesiers - PricewaterhouseCoopers have crunched the numbers and come up with just seven medals - and it shows the vagaries of Olympic competition and folly of predictions.
Of course, the only true measure of success is the final medal tally at the end Games. Kiwis will only really be satisfied with medals because it's what defines us at the Olympic Games and makes us feel important as a nation.
The rowers, sailors, cyclists, eventers, Adams (shot put), Lisa Carrington (canoe sprint) and Andrea Hewitt (triathlon) represent the best hopes and there's a chance New Zealand can eclipse the 13 won in Seoul in 1988.
That would be big news in New Zealand but will barely create barely a ripple globally given it's only a slice of the 2415 medals on offer in London.
There will be blood, sweat and tears - and not just on London's creaking transport system - and more gaffs than the one that saw the South Korean flag pictured alongside profiles of the North Korean players before their opening match with Colombia.
But ultimately these Olympics will be remembered for what happens in competition. People will watch the showdown between sprinters Usain Bolt and Yohan Blake or swimmers Michael Phelps and Ryan Lochte and whether Bradley Wiggins can follow up his historic win in the Tour de France with another Olympic gold because it's pure drama.
The hand of big business might be infiltrating the Olympic ideal horribly but the Games are still, ultimately, about sporting excellence. And they can still inspire a generation.