He said he would astonished if a ban resulted from any hearing and indicated that India were motivated by a desire to ensure Anderson played no further part in the series. "I think so," he said. "I think that's pretty much where it's come from. To be honest with you, in my opinion, it's a big mountain out of a molehill. There you go, I've got a line for you. You can use that and we can hopefully talk about something else."
England seem still to be genuinely nonplussed by the reporting of Anderson under Level 3 of the ICC's code of conduct which has entailed the appointment of a judicial commissioner. A preliminary hearing will probably be held next Tuesday and the process should move quickly after that. If Anderson is found guilty he could miss between one and four Tests, starting with the match at Southampton, the third in the Investec Series.
England formally responded to India's accusation today - they felt they had little option - by bringing charges against Jadeja for his part in the incident after the players went in for lunch on the second day of the Test. It is alleged by England that after the players went into the pavilion Jadeja "turned suddenly and took steps towards Anderson in an aggressive and threatening manner".
Jadeja is charged under Level 2 of the code - England levelled the charge against him only to be seen to support Anderson, who they judge to be guilty of nothing. Jadeja can be dealt with by the match referee with a maximum of a one-match ban. But England tried desperately to broker a peace deal before it reached this stage. India were determined to pursue their grievance.
Despite the assurances of the captains, the fear is that this Test will be blighted by acrimony - both sides appear to actively dislike each other. Cook said he intended to ensure that relations were not soured further. "I'm going to sound a little bit like Arsène Wenger," he said. "I genuinely didn't see the incident. MS and I have that responsibility as captains of the sides to make sure we control our players, and do not let that happen. We have a responsibility to people watching the game, responsibility under the ICC rules. I think it will make it good viewing."
Dhoni was in no doubt that India consider Anderson's behaviour beyond the pale and with the case pending he was reluctant to go further into detail about what he knew, but he also tried to be emollient. "What I would definitely like to do is make sure the remainder of the matches are played in the right spirit," he said. "At the same time it shouldn't be very docile, we want the players to be aggressive, we want them to say a few things, but it's very important not to flow with it and cross the boundaries."
It might already have gone too far for that.