It pointed out that there was a difference between swearing to insult others and casual use of bad language to describe a situation or inanimate object.
“We urge the FIA President to also consider his own tone and language when talking to our member drivers, or indeed about them, whether in a public forum or otherwise,” it added.
“Further, our members are adults, they do not need to be given instructions via the media, about matters as trivial as the wearing of jewellery and underpants.”
Ben Sulayem made waves last month in an interview in which he spoke out about “dirty language” and said drivers should not sound like rappers.
The GPDA repeated its view that driver fines were inappropriate.
It called on the FIA president to explain where the funds gathered were spent.
“We have also relayed our concerns about the negative image financial fines bring to the sport. We once again request that the FIA President provide financial transparency and direct, open dialogue with us,” the statement added.
“All stakeholders (FIA, F1, the Teams and the GPDA) should jointly determine how and where the money is spent for the benefit of our sport.”
Mercedes’ George Russell, a GPDA director, suggested last month that driver fines could help fund permanent race stewards.
“It does seem a little bit ridiculous if a driver gets a 50 grand fine for walking over a [live] race track, but if that 50 grand fine is going towards financing the best stewards in the world maybe we won’t be so upset about it,” he said.