But Cairns has this year been arrested and charged by the London Metropolitan Police with perjury in relation to evidence given at the libel trial.
It effectively means Cairns is now fighting for his reputation and possible future in the sport on two fronts - a High Court trial, scheduled for next October, and a civil case against the man he took to court in 2012.
While the cases are essentially the same in the fact they boil down to whether Cairns' was telling the truth when he told the High Court he had never been involved in match-fixing, the burden of proof could differ from one proceedings to the other.
Cairns appeared at Southwark Crown Court last month alongside Andrew Fitch-Holland, a barrister and friend who gave evidence in the libel trial and has been charged with perverting the course of justice. The case has been adjourned for a further preliminary hearing in.
The 2010 case was the first Twitter libel trial in England. Modi, then chairman of the IPL, tweeted in January 2010 that he had prevented Cairns joining the auction for the T20 league due to his links with corruption.
Justice Bean ruled that he "singularly failed" to provide any reliable evidence that Cairns was involved in fixing. In his written judgment Justice Bean said: "It is obvious that an allegation that a professional cricketer is a match-fixer goes to the core attributes of his personality and, if true, entirely destroys his reputation for integrity."
After winning the case Cairns said a "dark cloud" had been lifted and he could finally "walk into any cricket ground in the world with my head held high".
But the Herald revealed in December last year that Cairns was again under investigation by the International Cricket Council anti-corruption unit, along with Lou Vincent and Daryl Tuffey.
Vincent has since confessed to widespread match-fixing across at least three countries and has received multiple life bans from the sport.
Cairns has consistently denied the allegations.