In many ways, the critiques mirror a wider "identity politics" debate on the left. Proponents believe a person's ethnicity, gender and other personal characteristics are more important than policy, ideology or even social class. Lamia (@LI-politico) focused on ethnicity when she complained the list had only "12 non white people (Cursory glance)".
Also generating heat on the list was the influence of Dirty Politics. @Whaledump, which has been tweeting raw documents obtained from the hacking of Cameron Slater, showed how Twitter can be used to set the news agenda. This account swiftly acquired 6000-plus followers. This newsmaking potential had motivated us to put Slater first on our right-wing pundits list, something that did not satisfy everyone. Unionist Stephanie Rodgers: "The TOP FOUR rightwing pundits on @nzherald's list of Tweeters are deeply implicated in #dirtypolitics. What does THAT say?" Giovanni Tiso (@gtiso), who we included as a left-wing pundit, naturally smelled a rat: "In fact numbers 1 to 4 on that f***ing ridiculous list are the stars of @DirtyPoliticsNZ. But was @DirtyPoliticsNZ's account listed? No."
Bill Ralston (@BillyRalston), who we put on our right-wing pundit list, gave up on Twitter altogether: "Right. That's it. I'm retiring from twitter until after the election. Too many left trolls. You win. And good luck to that mateys! Cheers."
• Otago University political experts Dr Bryce Edwards (@bryce-edwards) and Geoffrey Miller (@GeoffMillerNZ) are following the impact of Twitter on the election campaign.