A discussion paper issued by the Internal Affairs Department yesterday proposed an increase in the minimum threshold to between 40 and 43 per cent within four years.
Raising thresholds would put $7 million back into the community for every percentage point increase.
The Class 4 reforms would also consider a proposal raised in Mr Flavell's bill - a restriction on how much money could be redistributed outside of the region in which it was spent. During debate on the bill, some pointed out that wealthy Remuera rugby clubs were funded by pokie losses in Otara.
Mr Flavell's bill sought to ensure 80 per cent of gaming machine profits were returned to the immediate community. This was scrapped after amendments at the select committee stage because of concerns about the policy's effect on the fundraising of national groups such as Surf Life Saving New Zealand or the New Zealand Rugby Union.
But the bill did give Government power to introduce those limits later on. A threshold of between 60 to 80 per cent was being considered.
Asked why limits on where pokie money could be spend were not supported in Mr Flavell's bill, Mr Tremain said that greater consultation with gaming trusts was required and more research was needed to find the right balance.
Pokie proceeds
Now: 37.12% of pokie proceeds must be given to community groups and sports teams
Proposed: More than 40% given to community
Now: Pokie proceeds can be distributed throughout country
Proposed: Up to 80% of proceeds must go back to the community where they were lost