"The prescriptions were for the most part, Class B and C controlled drugs with a high risk of abuse and dependency and the prescribing continued despite Mr D [the husband] exhibiting increasing signs of dependency and tolerance certainly through the later years."
Charge records showed 108 out of 180 prescriptions did not have any accompanying record in the patient notes.
"The consequences of the practitioner's actions were significant; being a significant contributor to her husband's admission to the hospital ICU for two days and the hospital ward for a further eight days.
"In the period from January to April, 3780 tablets were prescribed over 84 days, which is 45 tablets per day, 450mg, over this three-month period," the tribunal judgment says.
It also noted that the doctor "was very reluctant to prescribe medication to her husband, and on several occasions urged him to seek GP care, but he refused to see another GP".
"There is no question that this conduct constitutes malpractice, negligence and that it brings discredit on the medical profession."