Now, the Employment Relations Authority (ERA) has ruled that she was unjustifiably dismissed.
"Employees should not be subjected to such behaviour and when they raise their concerns those should be acted upon," ERA member Michael Loftus concluded in his determination.
Both parties have name suppression.
The woman had taken time from her studies to take up a bar job in February 2011 in a "desperate" bid to fund further studies.
She was soon offered a managerial role with a pay boost from $13.50 an hour to $16.
But she never received the extra cash, and instead was subjected to the inappropriate behaviour of her unnamed boss.
Meetings with management did not resolve the situation.
After almost five months, she resigned and launched her claim.
Mr Loftus was in no doubt that the woman, known in his judgement as 'K', was constructively dismissed.
"There is no doubt the comments were of a sexual nature, they were unwelcome and offensive and they detrimentally affected K's job satisfaction. She was sexually harassed," he said.
He ordered the bar to pay the woman $16,640 in lost wages, a further $8000 in compensation for humiliation, loss of dignity, and injury to feelings, as well as $1408.05 as recompense for unpaid wages.
