"I'm of the view that a compensation regime set up 20 years ago with dollar amounts has to be adjusted for inflation after 20 years at least because that is fair to people who have suffered a miscarriage of justice."
Pora took a judicial review of the decision not to include inflation in the $2.52 million compensation paid to him after he was wrongfully convicted of the 1992 rape and murder of Susan Burdett. About $500,000 to $600,000 may be at stake.
The High Court had ruled that in making the original compensation order, the minister had made an error in interpreting the guidelines around compensation.
"That error caused, or was compounded by, further errors in the minister's advice to Cabinet and in the reasons for the Cabinet decision itself."
The Government had until September 26 to appeal that decision - and Adams said because of the election on Saturday the Government was acting in a caretaker role so had to take whatever steps were possible to allow the next government to make a substantive decision.
"Filing the notice of appeal means that all courses of action are preserved for an incoming government. If the incoming government does not wish to appeal, the notice can be easily withdrawn."
Pora spent 20 years in jail before he was released on parole in 2014.
His convictions were quashed by the Privy Council in 2015, and in 2016 he received $2.52 million and a government apology.
That payout was based on a $100,000 figure for each year of incarceration - a figure that had not been adjusted for inflation since it was first set, despite former High Court judge Rodney Hansen's recommendations to that effect.