Thursday, 07 December 2023
KaitaiaWhangareiDargavilleAucklandThamesTaurangaHamiltonWhakataneRotoruaTokoroaTe KuitiTaumarunuiTaupoGisborneNew PlymouthNapierHastingsDannevirkeWhanganuiPalmerston NorthLevinParaparaumuMastertonWellingtonMotuekaNelsonBlenheimWestportReeftonKaikouraGreymouthHokitikaChristchurchAshburtonTimaruWanakaOamaruQueenstownDunedinGoreInvercargill
NZ HeraldThe Northern AdvocateThe Northland AgeThe AucklanderWaikato HeraldBay Of Plenty TimesRotorua Daily PostHawke's Bay TodayWhanganui ChronicleThe Stratford PressManawatu GuardianKapiti NewsHorowhenua ChronicleTe Awamutu CourierVivaEat WellOneRoofDRIVEN Car GuideThe CountryPhoto SalesiHeart RadioRestaurant Hub
Voyager 2023 media awards
Subscribe

Advertisement

Advertise with NZME.
Home / New Zealand / Politics

John Armstrong: 'Yes' - the only answer for Labour

NZ Herald
Saveshare

Share this article

facebookcopy linktwitterlinkedinredditemail
Labour Party leader Phil Goff. Photo / Mark Mitchell

Labour Party leader Phil Goff. Photo / Mark Mitchell

Phil Goff made a good fist yesterday of pretending Labour has a choice when it comes to supporting or not supporting National's emergency legislation overruling the Supreme Court decision blocking covert video surveillance by the police.

The sad fact is Labour has no choice but to vote alongside National when the governing party rams a bill nullifying the court's finding through Parliament next week with little or no public consultation.

It is no-win for Labour. If the party's MPs back the bill, they will incur the wrath of legal purists who argue the legislation offends constitutional niceties on at least three counts. It has been drafted in haste. It is retrospective. And it is being rushed through Parliament under urgency.

If Labour votes against the legislation, it stands to be accused of being soft on law and order.

Advertisement

Advertise with NZME.

Little more than two months before an election in which it is already starting from way behind, Labour is simply not in a strong enough position to take a stand and claim the moral high ground by not voting for the bill.

And National knows it. Once the Prime Minister declared on Monday that the Supreme Court ruling had put some 40 court trials at risk and "some very serious criminals could walk free", the debate was over for Labour before it had even begun.

Labour has little choice but to back the bill, even if National could get the numbers in Parliament from other quarters - something which was still unclear last night.

One of National's support partners, the Maori Party, was making it pretty obvious it could not vote for the bill.

Act, National's other partner, was last night still deciding what to do. The party might well regard the bill's infringement of the Bill of Rights as beyond the pale. But it could take a different tack, given its strong push on law and order.

The Greens will also oppose the measure out of principle.

Related articles

New Zealand

Urgent new law after Urewera case

19 Sep 04:14 AM
Entertainment

Te Urewera - from the beginning

18 Sep 05:00 PM
New Zealand|Politics

Urgent law change to sidestep court ruling on police undercover filming

19 Sep 05:30 PM
New Zealand|Politics

Govt defends urgent covert filming law change

19 Sep 09:49 PM

This is a case where minor parties have the luxury of being able to play to their audiences. Not so the major Opposition party. In such a situation, it is expected to take what most people would see as the responsible position and weigh in behind the Government. It would get the blame if just one trial was aborted because its votes had stymied the emergency legislation.

Labour cannot afford that. It was still making its dislike of the bill it has yet to see pretty plain yesterday. It was insisting that the measure be subject to select committee scrutiny, brief as that might have to be.

Advertisement

Advertise with NZME.

All in all, Labour was making clear its objections to the way National was handling things. But this amounts to little more than political window dressing prior to the party inevitably falling into line.

Saveshare

Share this article

facebookcopy linktwitterlinkedinredditemail

Advertisement

Advertise with NZME.

Latest from New Zealand

New Zealand|Crime

Greymouth man jailed for sexual offences on victims as young as 10

06 Dec 08:21 AM
Politics

Police Minister sets expectations for Commissioner in new letter

06 Dec 07:02 AM
Crime

Man who murdered his brother claims love triangle was not a motivator

06 Dec 07:00 AM
Premium
Politics

Claire Trevett: Friend or foe? Refreshed roll call of political enemies as new MP shines

06 Dec 06:05 AM

Toy trends for Christmas

sponsored

Advertisement

Advertise with NZME.

Latest from New Zealand

Greymouth man jailed for sexual offences on victims as young as 10

Greymouth man jailed for sexual offences on victims as young as 10

06 Dec 08:21 AM

Police commend bravery of victims after sentencing of 27-year-old Liam Nixon.

Police Minister sets expectations for Commissioner in new letter

Police Minister sets expectations for Commissioner in new letter

06 Dec 07:02 AM
Man who murdered his brother claims love triangle was not a motivator

Man who murdered his brother claims love triangle was not a motivator

06 Dec 07:00 AM
Premium
Claire Trevett: Friend or foe? Refreshed roll call of political enemies as new MP shines

Claire Trevett: Friend or foe? Refreshed roll call of political enemies as new MP shines

06 Dec 06:05 AM
More houses coming
sponsored

More houses coming

About NZMEHelp & SupportContact UsSubscribe to NZ HeraldHouse Rules
Manage Your Print SubscriptionNZ Herald E-EditionAdvertise with NZMEBook Your AdPrivacy Policy
Terms of UseCompetition Terms & ConditionsSubscriptions Terms & Conditions
© Copyright 2023 NZME Publishing Limited
TOP