We live in an unprecedented age of offence-seeking. Consider recent news items. Kim Dotcom ran a clever advertisement asserting that thousands of Kiwis live below the global broadband line, whereupon S. George, a ghastly complainant, was offended for God's sake, and wheedled to the Advertising Standards Authority. Apparently, in his mind, this terminology trivialised poverty. In fact, the only poverty exposed was S. George's character.
Another miserable soul, D. Henderson, also complained to the authority over an insurance company's advertisement which he said denigrated soccer players as unmanly. The advert has a boy asking his grandfather about his deceased father and whether he liked rugby or soccer and girls. Granddad replied, "He was one of the good ones - rugby - and he loved your mum with all his heart."
Henderson took offence, claiming this implied soccer players are a bunch of fairy queens. The authority rightly rubbished both complaints.
David Cunliffe made a clever word play when discussing fishing and labelled Judith Collins a trout, this an abbreviation of the derisory term for scolding women as "old trouts". The minister, who I'd have thought was of tougher mettle and would respond with a smart retort, instead whined about sexism.
Adversarial politics has a long history of personal abuse - it simply goes with the territory. If women MPs are going to cry sexism when on the receiving end then they should stay out of politics because it's not going to change. Numerous anthologies have been published, including several in New Zealand, of politicians' funny or clever abuse of each other. Churchill was famous for it. It's simply part of the trade. Also, our cartoonists weigh into politicians, often incredibly cruelly.