There were two descriptions of the villages under fire in the book.
The first said they "contained only a few farmers and mostly women, children and elderly people."
The second said they were mainly occupied by "women, children and the elderly when the troop carrying helicopters and Apache gunships arrived."
Both accounts fail to mention armed rebels in the villages, now acknowledged by Parker. So in reality this was a firefight and unfortunately some innocents lost their lives, which tragically happens in war zones.
So why have an inquiry?
The acknowledgement by Parker would seem to have sealed the fate of the book's veracity.
It's a waste of money and the claim by Parker that the controversy hasn't died down is flimsy.
But on the upside it could restore the public's faith in our Defence Forces if you accept restoration's necessary.
The Chief of Defence at the time was Jerry Mateparae who'll be playing host to Jacinda Ardern as our High Commissioner in London next week.
He managed to dodge the bullet last year when it came to defending the forces over the raids, that was left to the current chief, Tim Keating who's shortly stepping down from the job, a decision he made, the Government insists, before this inquiry was decided on.
Yeah well, he must have known one was coming though, former Labour leader Andrew Little insisted last year there'd be one.
A couple of people will be happy enough with the inquiry, those conducting it including former Labour Prime Minister Geoffrey Palmer.
But surely the money would have been better spent on the mould and leaks at Middlemore Hospital.