The threat charge carries a maximum penalty of seven years’ imprisonment, while possession of objectionable materials carries a maximum term of 10 years and distribution of such materials is punishable by up to 14 years’ jail.
During his first court appearance, the man’s defence lawyer at the time asked for interim name suppression on the basis that his client’s family could become targets of vitriol or threats. The suppression was extended a week later, after North Shore District Court Judge Clare Bennett referred to concerns in the community after the New Lynn attack.
Lawyer Peter Syddall also argued name suppression was needed to give his client the best chance of de-radicalising. The teen was not in the same position as the New Lynn attacker, he said at the time.
“We have a chance here. We need to do everything we can,” Syddall said. “If his name is made public that chance will be lost.”
Details about the allegations against the man, aside from the broad description of the charges he faced, were also initially suppressed.
Defence lawyer Annabel Cresswell indicated today that she may seek permanent name suppression when the man is sentenced.