EU legislation on labelling currently requires all food to carry a 'best before' date, whether the products are potentially dangerous, such as raw meat or eggs, or have a long shelf life, like frozen, dried and tinned goods.
Long-life foods, such Parmesan cheese, rice or coffee, might change colour, lose texture or have deterioration in flavour but remain edible and safe unless obviously otherwise, officials say. "People aren't stupid and smarter labelling can advise consumers to better understand when stable foods need to be thrown away, or not," said a diplomat.
A letter to the agriculture council, backed by the Netherlands, Sweden, Germany, Austria, Denmark and Luxembourg, said: "Consumers often throw food away unnecessarily because of confusion about the meaning of the 'best before' date."
Earlier this year vinegar - a preservative and flavouring - became one of the first widely-used foods to be exempted from the EU's 'best before' legislation.
The Government has estimated that unnecessarily discarded food costs the average British household £480 a year, rising to £680 for a family with children.
Although household food waste has fallen by 13 per cent across Britain since 2006, families still discard 7.2 million tons of food and drink every year, most of which could have been eaten.
Despite calls from the Government for a change in use-by labelling three years ago, Britain has not yet backed the EU proposals and has instead urged a full investigation into safety aspects of the change.
A spokesman for the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said: "We are fully engaged with discussions on 'best before' dates and are open to the possibility of exempting some foods from the mandatory requirement of giving a 'best before' date, such as foods with a high acid content.
"However, we believe the connection between these labels and food waste requires further investigation to ensure the removal of date marks doesn't have the opposite effect to that intended."