TV3 journalist Heather du Plessis-Allan has spoken out about police searching her home and having a sleepless night over it.

The host of the channel's programme, Story, has tonight told viewers how she felt when police indicated last night that they had a search warrant to search her home in Wellington.

"What does it feel like to have your house searched by police? Well, we did know yesterday that it was going to happen, but that doesn't give you the time to prepare. It just gives you a sleepless night.

"You might have nothing to hide, but you have so much - trust me - that you want to keep private. The police went through all my stuff. They know what's in my bedside drawer, they've looked inside the boxes under my bed, they've seen the receipts showing what I bought my family for Christmas."

Advertisement

The police's actions come after du Plessis-Allan broke a story showing a loophole that allowed her to purchase a rifle via mail order, without producing a gun licence.

Tonight's programme included video footage of police officers - including one who is believed to be a handwriting expert - going through a set of drawers and digging through a pile of receipts.

Du Plessis-Allan's husband, Newstalk ZB journalist Barry Soper, was tucking into a bowl of cereal as officers wearing gloves carry out their search.

Speaking on Story tonight, du Plessis-Allan said: "Here's my question - they want my handwriting, why didn't they search my desk, full of bits of paper I've written all over? Instead, they found almost nothing at home."She said she, like her colleagues, stood by the story wholeheartedly."Some people have online today have accused the police of intimidation or a waste of resources - I'm not doing that. I am just standing by the story that we did. It was good journalism and this will not stop us from doing good journalism on this show."

Co-host Duncan Garner then replied: "Right. Well said, I think."

Earlier today, police officers searched the apartment of du Plessis-Allan as part of an investigation into the unlicensed purchase of a rifle.

Newstalk ZB's Barry Soper tweeted a picture about 9.45am, apparently of police officers going through boxes of papers.

"Cops search our apartment in Wellington to find handwriting samples of Heather du Plessis-Allan to prove gun charges against her," said Soper.

Advertisement

Detective Senior Sergeant Andrew Saunders arrived at Soper's apartment this morning to present him with a search warrant.

The detective said it was being served to find handwriting samples of du Plessis-Allan.

Soper told the Herald police had made contact yesterday to tell him a search warrant had been issued for the couple's apartment.

"You have to be joking," Soper said he responded. He told the officers he was going out that evening so wouldn't be available and asked if they could come this morning.

At 8am, three officers turned up to conduct the search, including the investigation head Detective Senior Sergeant Andrew Saunders. One of the three was believed to be a handwriting expert.

"They went through drawers, bedside cabinets."

Soper was surprised that police officers travelled from Auckland to search their Wellington apartment without first searching her Auckland apartment.

Asked how du Plessis-Allan had reacted to the police search, he said: "It's always worrying, these things. But the fact is that the story was done in the full knowledge that there could have been repercussions.

"But the police acknowledged immediately there was a problem, that people were able to buy guns online without a licence and pose as somebody else."

He added: "You would have thought that in the public interest, this was the story to do. She did it, and now unfortunately it would seem they're trying to make her suffer the consequences."

Soper said police appeared to be over-reacting, and he questioned whether they would have put in as much effort for a lower-profile case.

"I think the police here have been caught napping and publicity was given to it.

"They don't like the fact that they've been seen as not perhaps doing their job as well as they could have.

"Because it's a high public profile case now, and it's a way that they can get back at those who made them look a bit foolish."

MediaWorks stand by team

Mark Weldon, Group CEO, MediaWorks issued a statement saying: "The Police are doing their job in the course of their investigations and that is perfectly normal.

"MediaWorks stands by the Story team and their focus on the flaw in the mail order gun system that allowed people to buy guns without valid firearms licences. It was an important piece of journalism and it has resulted in immediate changes to the rules around the mail order system which have now addressed that serious flaw.

"The public interest has clearly been served by the spotlight the Story team have put on this issue."

An "extreme" move

The search of du Plessis-Allan and Soper's home was an "extreme move" and would have to have been balanced against explicit safety checks in police policy, said barrister Felix Geiringer, the lawyer acting for investigative journalist Nicky Hager over a search warrant executed on his home.

Mr Geiringer said the rules for approving warrants against journalists were laid out in a specific procedure which stipulated personal sign-off being sought from a member of the police executive committee or a district commander.

He said it also required the approval of a judge when search warrants could normally be approved by senior court staff. The policy manual for searching executing search warrants on reporters was recognition issues of "particular sensitivity" existed when it came to media, he said.

Mr Geiringer said the sensitivity included maintaining public confidence in the freedom for media to gather information without the perception it could be seen as a rich source for police to mine. He said there was also important legal protection under the Evidence Act for reporters seeking protection of their sources.

"It does come across as heavy-handed. I'd be interested to know if they explored other methods of getting the information."

He said police "could have asked Barry or Heather directly", or approached Mediaworks.

He said the police investigation was over a month old and it was clear information relating to the apparent gun purchase would be sought. In the time since the investigation was launched, any suspect looking to destroy or interfere with evidence would have already done so - which meant a thorough search of the apartment for documentation relating to the case would be as useful as asking for it to be voluntarily produced.

Mr Geiringer said handwriting was something which could not be hidden - police could also have asked for du Plessis Allan to supply the information.

"A public service"

Labour's police spokesman Stuart Nash said the police investigation appeared to be heavy-handed.

"I accept that the law is the law, but in this case Ms du Plessis-Allan actually proved the law governing the online purchase of guns wasn't up to scratch and it was arguably a public service."

Mr Nash said police had discretion when deciding when to prosecute, and "this is a case where an element of judgement should be exercised".

He said police should be concentrating their resources on improving the relatively low sexual assault and burglary resolution rates.

Story highlights loophole

Du Plessis-Allan is a presenter on TV3's Story current affairs programme. In October, she broke a story highlighting a loophole which allowed the purchase of a rifle through mail order, apparently without producing a gun licence.

The mail order form, sent to the Gun City chain of shops, included bogus details - including an invented gun licence number which turned out to match a genuine licence holder's details.

It also included details which purported to show the purchase had been checked by a police officer and approved before the mail order form was sent to Gun City.

The current affairs show broke the story, saying the purchase revealed a major loophole.

Police immediately changed the process for ordering guns through the post - a form of ordering which constituted a low percentage of gun sales, according to Gun City owner David Tipple.

A police investigation was launched immediately into allegations "false details had been used to fraudulently obtain a firearm via an online/mail order dealer".

The police statement said possession of a firearm without a licence could lead to three months in prison and a fine of up to $1000. However, the investigation would also look further into charges of "obtaining by deception" which carried a maximum of seven years in prison.

"Police takes any incident involving the illegal obtaining or possessing of firearms extremely seriously," the police statement said.

Du Plessis-Allan defended the purchase as being in the public interest, saying it exposed a flaw in the gun ordering process.

Tipple said no loophole had been exposed because the .22 rifle had been bought by a deliberate flouting of the existing law.

He also pledged to take a private criminal prosecution against du Plessis-Allan if police decided against pressing charges.

'This reporter did us all a favour'

The police search of Heather du Plessis-Allan's house was the wrong action to take, says Professor Chris Gallavin of Massey University.

"An offence or offences have undoubtedly been committed in this case - I am not suggesting otherwise - but what I am saying is that there is a public interest factor here that speaks to the discretion not to prosecute," said Gallavin, ex Dean of Law at the University of Canterbury.

Du Plessis-Allan purchased a gun from Gun City online earlier this year allegedly using a form with a fictitious police identification number and signature. The order for the weapon was acknowledged by Gun City with the firearm being delivered to her door via courier days later.

"If we are going to talk about the public interest let's talk about the number of guns in the system that have been purchased by people without licences," Prof Gallavin said.

"There are two grounds for the exercise of prosecutorial discretion in New Zealand, one is an evidential ground and the second is a consideration of the public interest.

"The first is likely easily met by the police in this case but the second raises serious questions of public protection. This reporter did us all a favour," he said.

"And what does it say about the capability of the New Zealand police if a reporter with very limited resources can discover such a glaring and dangerous hole in the system that results in guns being delivered to the front door with effectively no questions asked?

"This is an appalling state of affairs and if motivated by the owner of Gun City bringing a private prosecution then let him do so - he has a right to do that if he wishes. But consideration of that should not be a factor in the police consideration of the wider public interest. Let him bring a private prosecution - and likely secure a prosecution - if he wants. My answer would be the same - discharge without conviction - this case is begging for such an outcome if it were to go to court.

"But let it not act as a smoke screen to the real issue of public safety which is not whether a journalist as part of good investigative journalism could secure the purchase of an item in a way that all New Zealanders should be shocked and appalled by."

- additional reporting Kurt Bayer