Rupert Grint and Daniel Radcliffe in a scene from Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 1. Photo / Roadshow Entertainment
Rupert Grint and Daniel Radcliffe in a scene from Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 1. Photo / Roadshow Entertainment
Rupert Grint has been ordered to pay another £1.8 million ($3.9m) in tax.
The Harry Potter actor, 36, is said to be worth £40m ($87.3m) after his appearances in the wizard-themed movie franchise, but it has now emerged there has been another bank balance-busting development inhis long-running legal battle with HMRC over his tax return from the 2011-12 financial year.
Best known for portraying Ron Weasley in the film adaptations of J K Rowling’sHarry Potter books, the actor previously lost his fight with the taxman in 2019 and was ordered to pay the huge sum following a probe into his return from 13 years ago.
It came after the star was given £4.5m ($9.8m) from a company which managed his business affairs as “consideration for rights, records and goodwill” from his work.
Grint said it was a “capital asset” and should be the subject of capital gains taxation.
But HMRC said the cash should have been registered as income and their investigation concluded the actor needed to pay another £1,801,060 ($3,931,425) in tax.
Rupert Grint, Daniel Radcliffe and Emma Watson at the premiere of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2 in New York City in 2011. Photo / Getty Images
The Daily Mail has reported the actor’s lawyers appealed against HMRC’s decision at a hearing in London in November and December 2022.
But the newspaper said a tribunal ruling saw Judge Harriet Morgan dismiss the appeal and find the sum was taxable as income.
In the 20 months up to April 5, 2010, Grint was said to have built up a turnover of £28m ($61.1m) and £15m ($32.7m) in profits.
Accountants tried to move eight months of his income from a 50% top tax rate in 2010-11 to the 40% rate in 2009-10 as they wanted to bring his accounts date back from July 31 to April 5.
The taxman agreed but denied Grint had actually gone ahead with the plan, and a London tax tribunal ruled he would not get the rebate.
Judge Barbara Mosedale ruled the conditions necessary to make a valid accounting date change had not been met.
Rupert Grint became a father in May 2020. Photo / Instagram
She said: “It was no part of HMRC’s case that Mr Grint was involved in tax avoidance.”
“HMRC accepted that he had the right to change his accounting date.
“The dispute solely concerned whether he had done so within the meaning of the legislation.”
