Last month the Workers Compensation Commission ordered Woolworths to pay Smith almost A$17,000 ($18,708) in lost wages as well as covering her medical and rehabilitation bills.
The payment was calculated based on Smith's 25 weeks of reduced work as a result of her injuries, however, counsel for the supermarket giant had unsuccessfully tried to claim that Smith was "not performing any work" at the time of the attack.
Court documents revealed a Woolworths store manager had also attempted to deny responsibility for the injury by placing the blame on centre management.
"Centre Management had previously been informed regarding a number of bird attacks and choose to do nothing about this until this and other serious incidents happened," the manager said.
According to official documents, the local council "had previously attempted to deter the peewee with the installation of two imitation owls. These efforts apparently were unsuccessful as the bird continued to swoop at and injure persons entering and leaving the Shopping Mall."
The commission's arbitrator, John Harris, ruled that Smith's employment had been a "substantial" contributing factor in the injury, and said the claim form submitted by Smith's store manager at the time "clearly established prior knowledge of bird attacks".
"It is extremely unlikely that Smith would have been attacked by the peewee at that time, had she not been in the course of her employment with the respondent. Whilst it is possible that, at that time, Smith may have been present at the Centre for personal reasons, such an inference is extremely unlikely," he said.
According to Fairfax, the bird was eventually shot on June 20 after the local council received a permit from National Parks and Wildlife.
