Economists have a saying: Governments aren't very good at picking winners, but losers sure are good at picking governments. Photo / Dean Purcell
Economists have a saying: Governments aren't very good at picking winners, but losers sure are good at picking governments. Photo / Dean Purcell
Opinion
COMMENT
In 1945, everyone looked forward to the end of World War II, but some economists and finance ministers were worried.
With demobilisation and big cutbacks of defence spending on the horizon – what would stop us sliding back into the mass unemployment of the 1930s, as indeed had happenedin many countries after World War I. Even in New Zealand, soldiers returning from the battlefields to a "land fit for heroes" found themselves instead propping up the dole queues.
Rationing, price controls and enthusiastic take-up of war bonds had freed the resources needed for war, while also building the balance sheets of households. There was a huge pent-up demand for the products of the reviving peacetime economy, and the resulting boom ended up fuelling the longest period of unbroken economic prosperity in the history of the Western world.
Well, what can we hope for as we come out of the war on Covid-19? Will there be a burst of consumer spending from pent-up demand? Everyone will need a haircut, of course, and those of us lucky enough to keep our jobs through the lockdowns will have some savings, which we should patriotically spend as fast we as can as soon as the shops open.
But that's probably not going to be enough to remobilise a private sector of which huge tranches have been simply forced to completely shut down. We need a big boost, fast. So, the Government has invited local authorities to prepare plans for "shovel-ready" projects – and, boy, have they responded, with long wish-lists requiring billions of dollars in subsidies.
I think this is quite the wrong thing to do. I have three concerns. First, a lot of these projects are dodgy from a cost-benefit perspective, and some may be particularly inappropriate to our new post-pandemic economy. Top of Wellington's list is an international convention centre - does the business plan for this still stack up, if indeed it ever did? Auckland has prioritised the ruinously expensive underground railway, premised on the assumption of continued mass commuting to the CBD.
Working from home, anybody? There's an economists' saying about all this: governments aren't very good at picking winners, but losers sure are good at picking governments.
Second, the one thing all of these projects have in common is that they do actually require shovels. They are all construction or physical infrastructure schemes. But have we forgotten that, just over one month ago, the most problematic sector in the economy was building and construction, stuck in an inflationary boom with cost overruns, delays and lagging house building? This sector is really the worst place to pump money into right now, because the supply side is stretched, and will be again soon after building recommences from today.
And thirdly, because of problem two, it turns out that most of these schemes couldn't actually be cranked up before six months from now, at the earliest. But we need a programme that will give relief to households and revenue to small and not-so-small businesses right across the country, and right away, the moment we get to lockdown level 2.
Tim Hazledine. Photo / supplied
There is only one way to do this fairly and efficiently, and it is a very good way. On the day that the Prime Minister announces the move to level 2, the Minister of Finance should startle the country by proclaiming a GST holiday: zero GST from tomorrow until…well, he probably shouldn't say when. Just get out there and enjoy it while you can, with 15 per cent more spending power in your pockets.
I think it is generally agreed - here and around the world - that macroeconomic crises like these justify governments moving into Keynesian deficit spending, as was done to good effect after the Global Financial Crisis a decade ago.
Instead of adding to the deficit by throwing expensive shovels at projects, and thereby taking the public sector's share of total spending up even further than its current, very high, level of 40 per cent of GDP, let's hold the line on spending and cut tax revenues for a while, and let the households and the business sector sort out the shovelling for themselves.
