Douglas says distinctions such as that between the Tower and ASB property exposures can have important implications for expected performance of the funds.
But even if most KiwiSaver members probably won't be shifting providers based on sophisticated analysis of the underlying investments, the information is still useful - at the very least it keeps the providers honest.
It's the kind of information, too, that institutional investors - including KiwiSaver and other superannuation funds - use to make their investment calls.
For example, as I highlighted in a July blog Tower's decision to drastically alter its equities investment process was likely to have consequences.
In August, NZ Harbours, which runs a superannuation and KiwiSaver scheme - announced in a newsletter it was reviewing its approximately $25 million mandate with Tower.
NZ Harbours asked its investment consultant, Melville Jessup Weaver, to offer its opinion on the Tower turnaround.
"Initial reports from the consultant have been received and are under consideration," the NZ Harbours newsletter says. "The Trustees are likely to make changes and appoint a new management structure."
While individual KiwiSaver members don't generally receive reports from asset consultants to help them fire their investment managers, the imminent Morningstar research is a positive step in that direction.