Basel 11 sets out an equation for bank housing loan capital adequacy using 'standardised' risk weightings that may not apply in every country.
And the RB says that in New Zealand, where banks apply the Basel 11 approach using their own "internal models", the global equation doesn't fit well with local conditions.
"In our view, housing loan losses in the New Zealand market are more highly correlated than assumed by the Basel equation," the RB consultation paper says. "... We consider that the equation gives too much weight to idiosyncratic risk (i.e., that associated with the particular circumstances of the borrower) compared to systemic risk (i.e., that associated with general economic conditions)."
If the economy comes under further stress "there is a risk that borrowers most exposed to adverse changes in general economic conditions could all come under pressure at the same time, with a corresponding impact on the quality of banks' housing loan portfolios", the RB says.
According to the RB paper, NZ banks internal models currently use housing risk weights of between 25 to 31 per cent compared to the standardised bank average of 38 per cent.
"Up until 2008, under Basel I, the risk weight for all housing loans was 50 per cent," the RB says.
But there's no use getting nostalgic for Basel 1. Basel 111 is already on the way (with a brief stop at Basel 2.5).