Trump is considering levies on as much as US$150 billion (NZ$213 billion) worth of Chinese imports on the grounds of alleged intellectual property theft, while Beijing has vowed to respond with tariffs of its own on everything from U.S. soybeans to planes.
The original letter, sent 88 years ago to urge US lawmakers to reject the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, didn't work. The law passed in 1930 and was a key factor in a trade war that deepened the worldwide economic slump. The authors of the current letter - including last year's Nobel winner Richard Thaler and Gregory Mankiw, a former chief economic adviser to President George W Bush - fear a repeat.
"We are convinced that increased protective duties would be a mistake. They would operate, in general, to increase the prices which domestic consumers would have to pay" and hurt "the great majority of our citizens," they write. "Few people could hope to gain from such a change."
Workers in construction, transportation, retail, banks, hotels, utilities and other professionals would "clearly lose" in a tariff war, the economists say, adding farmers would be doubly hurt -- paying higher prices for imported goods and seeing export options curtailed.
"Countries cannot permanently buy from us unless they are permitted to sell to us," the economists say. "We would urge our government to consider the bitterness which a policy of higher tariffs would inevitably inject into our international relations. A tariff war does not furnish good soil for the growth of world peace."